A friend of mine and I were recently discussing different things and two things
relating to scripture things came up. The first (what started the argument) Was I asked whether
morality could be determined by age; for example, we say that is wrong for a kid but OK for
an adult. My view was, if something is wrong should it not be wrong for all? She is a Christian
but made some comments I wasn't sure how to respond to. She implied that I "thought small"
because after about thirty minutes of debate I realized my morality was based totally on scripture.
When I said "moral" I meant biblical. She however was saying the Bible doesn't answer
everything and it is up to society to decide, because as she pointed out not every one is Christian and
I needed to see the whole picture. This sounds immoral to me and in arguing it (using the Bible)
she asked what seems un-biblical, yet I was stumped she said that "If the Old Testament grew into the
New Testament then
who's to say it isn't still growing?" She almost seemed to be implying that 1) scripture is not a
complete canon yet and 2) it should change based on society. This seems very un-biblical and
wrong but I wasn't sure how to respond effectively.
Thanks for your e-mail. The two questions you brought up show a great deal of insight on your part. I would be honored to help you work through these issues.
First, let's deal with morality. It's great that you base your moral behavior based on biblical principles. Unfortunately, not everyone is so wise. But even biblically speaking, there are some things that may be appropriate for some people that are not so wise for others. For instance, look at marriage. Wouldn't it be safe to say that a grown up married man is morally free to have sexual intimacy with his wife, but an unmarried teenage boy is not morally free to have sex with his girlfriend? Circumstances may determine some of our standards of behavior. Paul says in 1 Corinthians 10:23-33 that we are free to act the way we think we should (since we have been freed from the Law), but that we must first consider that our actions affect others. Christian morality is not based on a list of rights and wrongs, but on the law of love for one another. Sure, there are some things that are always wrong (such as murder), and some that are always right (such as love), but to say that every wrong is wrong for everyone is going to lead to trouble.
Your friend has a point that not every issue is covered specifically in the Bible. But the Bible's principles can be applied to every issue. So, in fact, to think biblically is to think about the "big picture." Society is actually more interested in keeping order than in encouraging morality. Age, therefore, does make a difference about what a person ought to do; not because morality is relative, but because sources of weakness can be different in people.
The freedom that we Christians have to make decisions is kept in check with our biblically-minded discernment about what is best for others and ourselves.
To answer your second question: yes, the canon of Scripture is closed. The New Testament is not just a highlight in the evolutionary development of the Old Testament. It is the "New Covenant." It's called a covenant because Jesus Christ fulfilled in person the "Old Covenant's" purpose. Hebrews 1:1-2 points out that God has spoken in these "last days" in the person of Jesus Christ. The Old Testament is the inspired foreshadowing of Jesus. The New Testament is the inspired testimony to His life and works. The first few centuries of Christians had divinely guided criteria for evaluating the worthiness of a letter to be included in the New Testament. (For more on this, see Don Closson's article on the Web at http://www.probe.org/docs/xn-canon.html.) Nothing society or anyone else can come up with since could come close to adding to what Jesus has already done.
Furthermore, Jesus is the Word of God. How can God's very presence on earth be matched? His ascension into the heavens ended His earthly ministry. In the same way, His ascension also ended any speculation about another testament. (That's why there can be no new New Testament.) When He spoke the words "It is finished" on the cross, it illustrates that there is nothing else to be revealed. All that is necessary now is the fulfillment of His New Covenant, with the ministry of God's Spirit (through His church) and Jesus' glorious return. Our job is not to write more books of the Bible in order to make it apply to society. Instead we need to take what's already there and interpret it's vital and timeless message to every new society.
I hope this helps with your questions. If you have any more questions or need some elaborating, please feel free to respond. Awesome questions! He rewards those who seek Him.