|
|
  
Recovering Biblical Manhood and Womanhood
A Response to Evangelical Feminism
Wayne Grudem and John Piper
[ Previous | Table
of Contents]
Appendix 2
The Danvers Statement
The Council on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood
Rationale
We have been moved in our purpose by the following contemporary developments
which we observe with deep concern:
- The widespread uncertainty and confusion in our culture regarding the
complementary differences between masculinity and femininity;
- the tragic effects of this confusion in unraveling the fabric of marriage
woven by God out of the beautiful and diverse strands of manhood and womanhood;
- the increasing promotion given to feminist egalitarianism with accompanying
distortions or neglect of the glad harmony portrayed in Scripture between
the loving, humble leadership of redeemed husbands and the intelligent,
willing support of that leadership by redeemed wives;
- the widespread ambivalence regarding the values of motherhood, vocational
homemaking, and the many ministries historically performed by women;
- the growing claims of legitimacy for sexual relationships which have
Biblically and historically been considered illicit or perverse, and the
increase in pornographic portrayal of human sexuality;
- the upsurge of physical and emotional abuse in the family;
- the emergence of roles for men and women in church leadership that
do not conform to Biblical teaching but backfire in the crippling of Biblically
faithful witness;
- the increasing prevalence and acceptance of hermeneutical oddities
devised to reinterpret apparently plain meanings of Biblical texts;
- the consequent threat to Biblical authority as the clarity of Scripture
is jeopardized and the accessibility of its meaning to ordinary people
is withdrawn into the restricted realm of technical ingenuity;
- and behind all this the apparent accommodation of some within the church
to the spirit of the age at the expense of winsome, radical Biblical authenticity
which in the power of the Holy Spirit may reform rather than reflect our
ailing culture.
Purposes
Recognizing our own abiding sinfulness and fallibility, and acknowledging
the genuine evangelical standing of many who do not agree with all of our
convictions, nevertheless, moved by the preceding observations and by the
hope that the noble Biblical vision of sexual complementarity may yet win
the mind and heart of Christ's church, we engage to pursue the following
purposes:
- To study and set forth the Biblical view of the relationship between
men and women, especially in the home and in the church.
- To promote the publication of scholarly and popular materials representing
this view.
- To encourage the confidence of lay people to study and understand for
themselves the teaching of Scripture, especially on the issue of relationships
between men and women.
- To encourage the considered and sensitive application of this Biblical
view in the appropriate spheres of life.
- And thereby
- to bring healing to persons and relationships injured by an inadequate
grasp of God's will concerning manhood and womanhood,
- to help both men and women realize their full ministry potential through
a true understanding and practice of their God-given roles,
- and to promote the spread of the gospel among all peoples by fostering
a Biblical wholeness in relationships that will attract a fractured world.
Affirmations
Based on our understanding of Biblical teachings, we affirm the following:
1. Both Adam and Eve were created in God's image, equal before God as
persons and distinct in their manhood and womanhood.
2. Distinctions in masculine and feminine roles are ordained by God
as part of the created order, and should find an echo in every human heart.
3. Adam's headship in marriage was established by God before the Fall,
and was not a result of sin.
4. The Fall introduced distortions into the relationships between men
and women.
- In the home, the husband's loving, humble headship tends to be replaced
by domination or passivity; the wife's intelligent, willing submission
tends to be replaced by usurpation or servility.
- In the church, sin inclines men toward a worldly love of power or an
abdication of spiritual responsibility, and inclines women to resist limitations
on their roles or to neglect the use of their gifts in appropriate ministries.
5. The Old Testament, as well as the New Testament, manifests the equally
high value and dignity which God attached to the roles of both men and
women. Both Old and New Testaments also affirm the principle of male headship
in the family and in the covenant community.
6. Redemption in Christ aims at removing the distortions introduced
by the curse.
- In the family, husbands should forsake harsh or selfish leadership
and grow in love and care for their wives; wives should forsake resistance
to their husbands' authority and grow in willing, joyful submission to
their husbands' leadership.
- In the church, redemption in Christ gives men and women an equal share
in the blessings of salvation; nevertheless, some governing and teaching
roles within the church are restricted to men.
7. In all of life Christ is the supreme authority and guide for men
and women, so that no earthly submission-domestic, religious, or civil-ever
implies a mandate to follow a human authority into sin.
8. In both men and women a heartfelt sense of call to ministry should
never be used to set aside Biblical criteria for particular ministries.
Rather, Biblical teaching should remain the authority for testing our subjective
discernment of God's will.
9. With half the world's population outside the reach of indigenous
evangelism; with countless other lost people in those societies that have
heard the gospel; with the stresses and miseries of sickness, malnutrition,
homelessness, illiteracy, ignorance, aging, addiction, crime, incarceration,
neuroses, and loneliness, no man or woman who feels a passion from God
to make His grace known in word and deed need ever live without a fulfilling
ministry for the glory of Christ and the good of this fallen world.
10. We are convinced that a denial or neglect of these principles will
lead to increasingly destructive consequences in our families, our churches,
and the culture at large.
The "Danvers Statement" was prepared by several evangelical
leaders at a CBMW meeting in Danvers, Mass., in December, 1987. It was
first published in final form by the CBMW in Wheaton, Ill., in November,
1988. We grant permission and encourage interested persons to use, reproduce,
and distribute the Danvers Statement. Additional copies of this brochure
are available for a donation of $9.00 for 50, and $15.00 for 100, postpaid,
from CBMW, P.O. Box 317, Wheaton, IL 60189.
Council Members
Gary Almy, M.D.
Prof. of Psychiatry and Assoc. Dean
Chicago Medical School
Gleason Archer, Ph.D.
Professor of Old Testament
Trinity Evangelical Divinity School
Donald Balasa, J.D.
Attorney, Wildwood, Illinois
James Borland, Th.D.
Prof. of New Testament and Theology
Liberty University
Waldemar Degner, Ph.D.
Professor of Exegetical Theology
Concordia Seminary (Ft. Wayne, Ind.)
Lane T. Dennis, Ph.D.
President, Crossway Books
Thomas R. Edgar, Th.D.
Professor of New Testament, Capital Bible Seminary
John M. Frame, M.Phil.
Professor of Systematic Theology
Westminster Theological Seminary
W. Robert Godfrey, Ph.D.
Professor of Church History
Westminster Theological Seminary
Wayne A. Grudem, Ph.D.*
Assoc. Prof. of Systematic Theology
Trinity Evangelical Divinity School
H. Wayne House, Th.D., J.D.*
Vice-president and Professor of Theology
Western Baptist college
R. Kent Hughes, D.Min.*
Senior Pastor
College Church in Wheaton (Illinois)
James B. Hurley, Ph.D.
Professor of Counseling
Reformed Theological Seminary
Elliot Johnson
Professor of Bible Expostion
Dallas Theological Seminary
S. Lewis Johnson, Jr. Th.D.*
Minister, Believers Chapel, Dallas
Mary A. Kassian
Author, Women's Ministry Consultant
Calvary Baptist Church, Edmonton
Rhonda H. Kelley, Ph.D.
Associate Director, Innovative Evangelism
New Orleans, Louisiana
George W. Knight, III, Th.D.
Administrator, Dean and Professor of New Testament
Knox Theological Seminary
Beverly LaHaye
President
Concerned Women for America
Betty Jo Lewis
Homemaker
Atlanta, Georgia
Connie Marshner
Editor
Child Family Protection Inst.
Richard Mayhew, Th.D.
Vice-Pres., Dean of Grad. Studies
The Master's Seminary
Douglas J. Moo, Ph.D.
Chairman, Dept. of New Testament
Trinity Evangelical Divinity School
Raymond C. Ortlund, Jr., Ph.D.
Asst. Prof. of Old Testament
Trinity Evangelical Divinity School
Dorothy Patterson, D.Min.
Homemaker
Dallas, Texas
John Piper, Dr. Theol.*
Senior Pastor
Bethlehem Baptist Church (Minneapolis)
Joyce Rogers
Homemaker
Memphis, Tennessee
Ken Sarles, Th.M.
Asst. Prof. of Systematic Theology
Dallas Theological Seminary
Siegfried Schatzmann, Ph.D.
Professor of New Testament
Oral Roberts University
Larry Walker, Ph.D.
Professor of Old Testament
Mid-America Seminary
William Weinrich, Ph.D.
Professor of Church History
Concordia Seminary (Ft. Wayne, Ind.)
|
|
*Currently serving on the Council's Executive Committee
Board of Reference
| Hudson T. Armerding
Harold O. J. Brown
D. A. Carson
Edmund Clowney
Jerry Falwell
Carl F. H. Henry
Paul Karleen
D. James Kennedy
Gordon R. Lewis
Erwin Lutzer
John MacArthur, Jr.
Marty Minton
|
Thomas McComiskey
J. I. Packer
Paige and Dorothy Patterson
Pat Robertson
Adrian and Joyce Rogers
Bob Slosser
R. C. Sproul
James A. Stahr
Joseph M. Stowell, III
John F. Walvoord
Luder Whitlock
Peter Williamson
|
Copyright 1997 Council on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood. All rights
reserved.
[Previous | Table
of Contents]
Recovering Biblical Manhood and Womanhood can be ordered online
through the CBMW Store.
Council on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood
2825 Lexington Road
Box 926
Louisville, KY 40280
Phone: 1-888-560-8210
Fax: (502) 897-4061
Email: info@cbmw.org
Web Site: www.cbmw.com
Email this to a friend
copyright
© 1995-2009
Leadership U. All rights reserved.
Updated: 14 July 2002
|