|
![]() ![]()
Access Research NetworkBook ReviewsHistone deletion mutants challenge the molecular clock hypothesisMichael J. Behe, "Histone deletion
mutants challenge the molecular clock hypothesis," Early in the development of the molecular clock hypothesis, it was discovered that not all proteins "ticked" at the same rate. When compared across a range of species, the fibrinopeptides, for instance, were much "faster clocks" (i.e., having a higher rate of amino acid substitution) than the very conservative, "slowly ticking" histones. These differences, writes Michael Behe (Chemistry, Lehigh University), required a modification to the clock hypothesis: the postulate of functional constraints. Thus, for example, histone H4 would diverge less rapidly than fibrinopeptides if a larger percentage of H4 amino acid residues were critical for the function of the molecule. (p. 374) The problem with the notion of functional constraint, Behe argues, is an absence of experimental support:
"Recent experiments," writes Behe, "now indicate that the key assumption of functional constraints may not be valid." Since the histones are so highly conserved -- "the H4 sequence of the green pea differs from that of mammals by only two conservative substitutions in 102 residues" -- one might expect that "few, if any, substitutions could be tolerated in the H4 sequence" (p. 374). However, experiments (reported in detail by Behe) have shown that large parts of the histone molecule may be deleted without significantly affecting the viability of the organism (in this instance, yeast) -- results which, Behe argues, should trouble defenders of the molecular clock hypothesis:
The resolution of the dilemma, Behe contends, must "as far as possible be grounded in quantitative, reproducible experiments, rather than in simple correlations with time that are its current basis" (p. 375). Otherwise, he concludes:
Copyright © 1997 Access Research Network.
All rights reserved. International copyright secured. This article provided by Access Research Network.
Access Research Network
Email this to a friendcopyright © 1995-2008 Leadership U. All rights reserved. Updated: 14 July 2002 |