Leadership U. EasyGift

Academics
Humanities
Social Sciences
Sciences
Theology
Academic Integration
Faculty Offices

Departments
Current Issues
Publications
Conferences/Events
Apologetics
Ministry Tools
Bible Studies
What's New

Special Interest
Past Features
Other Sites
Help LU
About LU
Privacy Policy
Link to LU
Feedback

Navigation
Site Map
Site Index
Advanced Search
Browsing Help
LU Home


LU Updates
Receive
LU-Announce

subscribe

 
     
ConversationsResource Center

Special Class Protections for Self-Alleged Gays: A Question of "Orientation" and Consequences

A public policy analysis
by Tony Marco

Copyright Tony Marco, 1991-1994, all rights reserved


Previous | Table of Contents | Next


Affirmative Action

  • While some "gay rights" laws by clear provision include affirmative action for homosexuals (e.g., a proposed Colorado Springs, CO, "Human Rights Ordinance", and Boulder, CO's "gay rights" ordinance both contain, in the opinion of some civil rights authorities, clauses allowing for affirmative action for gays), implicit affirmative action obligations have ensued benefiting all previously protected classes (except religion, because church-state conflicts prohibit) and would almost certainly arise from "gay rights" laws, when coupled with other state and federal anti-discrimination statutes. Unquestionably, granting "sexual orientation" special, protected class status will raise questions of affirmative action obligations. U.S. Presidential Executive Order 11246 specifically orders all government agencies and companies seeking goverment contracts to immediately establish affirmative action for any non-religious group attached to the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Gay activists have been attempting to attach themselves to this act for 20 years. The courts have also consistently awarded affirmative action to any non-religious group granted the right to make claims of discrimination. Giving gays that right would virtually guarantee that they enjoyed affirmative action remedies.
  • On occasion, gay militants have flatly denied that they seek affirmative action for gays. Other times, gay activists freely admit they do want affirmative action. In After the Ball, Kirk and Madsen suggest as part of a "Waging Peace Agenda for Change Among Straights": "ACTIONS... CURRENT... 10. Rights of gays to work, shelter, and public accommodations are limited by public intolerance... PREFERRED... [10.] Gays are assured, by affirmative action, if necessary, equal opportunity in these regards" (Op. cit., p. 108, emphasis added).
  • Gays have already sought and received affirmative action recognition, in San Francisco, for instance, where 20% of all city appointments have been granted to homosexuals, and in Seattle, where the police department has established hiring quotas for gay officers.

Previous | Table of Contents | Next

- Email this to a friend


copyright © 1995-2008 Leadership U. All rights reserved.
Updated: 13 July 2002