Leadership U. EasyGift

Academics
Humanities
Social Sciences
Sciences
Theology
Academic Integration
Faculty Offices

Departments
Current Issues
Publications
Conferences/Events
Apologetics
Ministry Tools
Bible Studies
What's New

Special Interest
Past Features
Other Sites
Help LU
About LU
Privacy Policy
Link to LU
Feedback

Navigation
Site Map
Site Index
Advanced Search
Browsing Help
LU Home


LU Updates
Receive
LU-Announce

subscribe

 
     
ConversationsResource Center

Special Class Protections for Self-Alleged Gays: A Question of "Orientation" and Consequences

A public policy analysis
by Tony Marco

Copyright Tony Marco, 1991-1994, all rights reserved


Previous | Table of Contents | Next


Potential Legal Costs

In 1991, a California Superior Court ordered Shell Oil to pay $5.3 million for wrongful discharge of Jeffrey Collins, a homosexual manager. Collins was terminated when his superiors discovered a memo he wrote on an office computer advertising an off-the-job "safe sex" party for gay men. The Court ruled that Collins' memo was "political activity" protected under California Supreme Court precedent. In 1982, The Christian Science Monitor discharged an alleged lesbian because of her sexual orientation. Though the Massachusetts Supreme Court ruled that the Monitor had grounds to terminate based on religious interests, they have allowed the alleged lesbian to pursue tort damages. The Monitor has declined to reveal the amount of their escalating legal expenses, for fear of encouraging other similar lawsuits. Resolving claims of discrimination based on "sexual orientation" could prove extremely costly. If an employer is found guilty, penalties can be exorbitant. Again, under state or municipal "gay rights" ordinances, an employer charged pays not only for its own defense, but, through taxation, for its own prosecution. An employer eventually cleared of discrimination charges may still face substantial attorneys' fees in addition to being penalized by lost time and inconvenience.

(The above cases, while pointing to potential dangers of "gay rights" ordinances, also reveal, however, the extent to which gays are already protected from wrongful discharge under tort law -- not on the basis of their homosexuality, but on the basis of exemplary employment. Additional protections are available to homosexuals who are members of duly established protected classes, again, not on the basis of homosexuality, but because of age, ethnic status, skin color, etc.) But legal hazards arising from awarding protected class status to "sexual orientation" would also be compounded by the following potential complications:


Previous | Table of Contents | Next

- Email this to a friend

copyright © 1995-2008 Leadership U. All rights reserved.
Updated: 13 July 2002