  
The Slaughter of the Innocents: Kosovo and Just War Theory
BreakPoint Commentary - March 31, 1999
By Charles W. Colson
Up until now, I have been hesitant to make any
statements about our bombing raids on Serbia. I served
in the Marines during Korea, and I was in the White
House during Vietnam, so, of all people, I understand
how crucial it is to back our military. And I do.
I'm proud of the great job they're doing. This
commentary is in no way directed at them.
As a Christian I feel compelled, however, to express
grave misgivings before our government takes the
next step, which I fear will be to commit troops.
This could result only in a quagmire like Vietnam.
And if that should happen, it would be a direct
result of abandoning our Christian principles.
In the fifth century, Augustine articulated what we
call the Just War Theory, describing the
circumstances that could justify the reluctant and
limited use of force. And Christians have embraced
this doctrine for 1,500 years.
The current NATO campaign meets NONE of the criteria
of the Just War Theory. While stopping Milosevic's
horrendous reign of terror against the Albanians of
Kosovo may be a great humanitarian objective, that
alone does not make it a just cause.
First, the Just War Theory requires that war be
declared by the proper authority and be waged to
resist an attack. There has been no attack here.
This war is being waged within a sovereign state.
And while President Clinton believes he has the
Authority to commit U.S. troops to the region,
presenting Congress with a fait accompli sets
a troubling precedent.
Harry Summers, a distinguished military historian and
columnist, put it best when he quoted a
turn-of-the-century group called the Anti-Imperialism
League, which opposed America's involvement in another
foreign war: "If an administration
may with impunity deliberately create a condition of
war anywhere in the world, representative government
itself is imperiled."
Second, the Just War Theory requires the protection of
noncombatants. But our bombing, supposedly to stop
Milosevic, has caused him to intensify his attacks so
That more civilians are being killed--the very
opposite of our well-intentioned goals.
And the Just War doctrine requires that war be
launched only if it has a reasonable chance of
succeeding. As good as our pilots are, nobody
believes that Milosevic can be brought to his knees
by air power alone. In fact, given the evidence of
the past two days--the horrible stories of entire
villages being slaughtered--our attacks apparently
have only emboldened him.
The only way the NATO plan could possibly stop
Milosevic is to use ground troops. But introducing
troops would ask thousands of Americans to risk their
lives in a cause that resoundingly fails the Just War
test. We would be mired in the mountains of
Yugoslavia.
So, what should American policy be? First, we ought
to be helping with the refugee crisis that our policy
has exacerbated. And that means sending aid to
Macedonia and Albania.
Second, we should employ every non-military means to
coerce Serbia into giving up its attacks on innocent
people. If NATO is serious, it could squeeze
the Serb economy, blockading and even isolating that
country.
And Christians must pray for those in authority,
and especially for the safety of our pilots. But at
the same time, we ought not be afraid to speak
prophetically against the unjustified use of military
power.
As one who lived through Vietnam while working in the
White House, I never again want to see our troops
committed to a fruitless ground war--certainly not when
doing so fails to meet a fundamental expression of
Christian doctrine.
Copyright (c) 1999 Prison Fellowship
Ministries. Reprinted with permission.
"BreakPoint with Chuck Colson" is a radio
ministry of Prison Fellowship Ministries.
Email this to a friend
copyright
© 1995-2008
Leadership U. All rights reserved.
Updated: 13 July 2002
|