  
First Things
The Christian Mission in the Third Millenium
Evangelizing and Reevangelizing Latin America With
---Not Against---One Another
Edward Idris Cardinal Cassidy
Copyright (c) 1998 First
Things 79 (January 1998): 24-26.
In October 1997, immediately following the meeting of evangelical
Protestant and Roman Catholic theologians who agreed on the foregoing statement,
"The Gift of Salvation," North American Evangelicals and Catholics
met with Catholic bishops from Latin America, led by Archbishop Oscar Rodriguez,
president of CELAM, the council of Latin American bishops conferences.
The meeting was convened by Mr. Charles Colson and Father Richard John
Neuhaus, and was opened by John Cardinal O’Connor, Archbishop of New York.
The following presentation was made by Edward Cardinal Cassidy, President
of the Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity.
— The Editors
The great challenge facing the Christian churches today is how to bring
the good news of Jesus Christ to the men and women of our times and of
the approaching new millennium. It is for this reason that we hear a great
deal about evangelization, reevangelization, and new evangelization. The
task of evangelizing is not something new for the Church, but the actual
challenge is new, since the circumstances in which this task is to be carried
out today differ radically from those of earlier times.
We cannot speak of this challenge without also bringing into our discussions
the question of ecumenism, the search for unity among Christians. It is
significant that the modern ecumenical movement began in the first World
Missionary Conference in Edinburgh, Scotland, in 1910, when an international
group of Protestants and Anglicans assembled to discuss ways of cooperating
rather than competing in the work of mission.
The prayer for the unity of his disciples which Our Lord Jesus Christ
addressed to the Father on the night before he suffered—that they may all
be one—makes it clear that this unity is essentially linked to the mission
of bringing salvation to all peoples: so that the world may believe that
you have sent me (John 17:21).
The Second Vatican Council considered "the restoration of unity
among all Christians" to be "one of its principal concerns,"
and said of the division among the followers of the one Lord Jesus Christ
that it "openly contradicts the will of Christ, scandalizes the world,
and damages that most holy cause, the preaching of the Gospel to every
creature." To the nonbeliever it would seem, says the Council document
Unitatis Redintegratio, "as if Christ himself were divided."
Hence evangelization and ecumenism should go hand in hand. But that
has not always been the case, nor is it always so today. At the beginning
of the present century the churches were certainly much more interested
in maintaining their own separate position in the world and where possible
increasing their membership, even if that meant conversion to their community
from other churches and ecclesial communities. In many places there was
a deep hostility between churches, an inheritance of the tragic disputes
and wars of previous centuries. In his apostolic letter Tertio Millennio
Adveniente, Pope John Paul II speaks about that "painful chapter of
history to which the sons and daughters of the Church must return with
a spirit of repentance" when acquiescence was given, "especially
in certain centuries, to intolerance and even the use of violence in the
service of truth." The Inquisition is one example of this on the part
of the Catholic Church, and there are similar examples on the part of other
Christian churches and ecclesial communions.
Much progress has been made in the second half of this century in establishing
a new type of relationship among Christians. Pope John Paul II has characterized
the fruits of the efforts to restore unity among the followers of Christ
as brotherhood rediscovered. There is no doubt that we have moved away
from a spirit of confrontation to one of dialogue, and as a result there
is today an aspiration among Christians for much greater unity.
The Second Vatican Council, in the Decree on Ecumenism Unitatis Redintegratio,
urged Catholics to "joyfully acknowledge and esteem the truly Christian
endowments from our common heritage which are to be found among other Christian
communions." It is right and salutary, the Council affirmed, "to
recognize the riches of Christ and virtuous works in the lives of others
who are bearing witness to Christ, sometimes even to the shedding of their
blood."
Pope John Paul II takes up this same thought in his encyclical Ut Unum
Sint (That They May Be One): "The relationships which the members
of the Catholic Church have established with other Christians since the
Council have enabled us to discover what God is bringing about in members
of other churches and ecclesial communities. . . . A vast new field has
thus opened up for the whole ecumenical experience." And referring
to the immense number of those who in this century gave the ultimate witness
of martyrdom, Pope John Paul II affirms: "Such a joint witness of
holiness, as fidelity to the one Lord, has an ecumenical potentiality rich
in grace."
This does not mean that our search has come to an end. There are many
places in the world where we still find much tension between the churches.
Russia is a prime example, and there are many others. Latin America, as
we all know, is certainly not free of such tension. In fact, the Catholic
Churches in Latin America find themselves often in a not dissimilar situation
to the Orthodox Churches in Eastern Europe. The Catholic bishops see the
situation as one in which their faithful are being stolen, while those
accused of this theft are convinced that they are simply bringing the good
news of Jesus Christ to those who have not had the Gospel adequately preached
to them. There are, on the one hand, accusations of insensitivity to the
presence of long-standing Christian communities and charges of proselytism,
while, on the other hand, there are countercharges of persecution or denial
of religious freedom.
This is not an easy situation with simple solutions. The Catholic Church
has evangelized Latin America over a period of five hundred years. It has
established the Christian Church in that continent. Missionaries have given
their lives to bring the Gospel to the natives of these lands. Huge resources
in manpower and money have been invested. Through the centuries the Catholic
Church has played an important role in the life of the people, a role that
has extended far beyond the walls of local congregations, permeating every
aspect of the culture—from art, to music, to social institutions, to festivals
and other public celebrations. Within a few years, the Catholics of Latin
America will make up 50 percent of the members of the Catholic Church throughout
the world.
It would be dangerous, however, for the Catholic Church to put too much
emphasis on past accomplishments. It can be assumed that a culture remains
permeated by faith when that is in fact no longer true. In any case, it
is obvious that much evangelization remains to be done among the peoples
of Latin America. The questions is: Who is to do it? Thus the title of
my remarks: "The Christian Mission in the Third Millennium: Evangelizing
and Reevangelizing Latin America With—Not Against—One Another. "
It seems to me that there are some fundamental principles that should
be taken into consideration in interchurch relations in such places as
Eastern Europe or Latin America, principles by which we might avoid conflict
and move towards evangelization in an ecumenical spirit.
1. It is surely just that the church that has evangelized a country
or people should be held in respect by others who come later on the scene.
This sense of respect would seem to require that newcomers not target for
their evangelizing work the active, baptized members of the church that
has been responsible for the original evangelization, and that they seek
to enter into contact and dialogue with those who have preceded them.
2. It should be taken as a fundamental principle that every person has
the right to belong to one or another church or ecclesial communion according
to his or her conscience, provided of course that a decision to leave one
community for another is made in true freedom and for the proper motives.
3. Every church or ecclesial communion should be able to bear witness
to the Gospel. Indeed it is hard to imagine a church or similar Christian
body that does not have an obligation to do just that. Consequently, every
church or ecclesial communion should have the right to accept into its
membership those who in conscience decide that they belong there. It should
not automatically be concluded that such a transfer is the result of proselytism.
It is, after all, much more important that a person find salvation in Christ
than that he or she belong without conviction to any particular community.
Let me note in this regard a statement taken from a special report of
the Joint Working Group between the Catholic Church and the World Council
of Churches on the question of proselytism: "Religious freedom affirms
the right of all persons to pursue the truth and witness to the truth according
to their conscience. This includes the freedom to acknowledge Jesus Christ
as Lord and Savior and the freedom of Christians to witness to their faith
in him by word and deed."
4. It is important, however, that the preaching of the Gospel be free
from any taint of proselytism—by which I mean the use of unworthy means
to attract members of other churches or even unchurched persons to their
fold. Misrepresentation of the other, or of one’s own community, is a common
source of tension. Some of the tension between churches comes from the
way in which new converts to one community denigrate their former ecclesial
home. Unfortunately, these converts are often the most bitter enemies of
the religious family to which they once belonged.
In considering these suggested guidelines, it would be good to keep
in mind an orientation given to the Catholic Church by the Second Vatican
Council, which declared in Unitatis Redintegratio that we should not "forget
that whatever is wrought by the grace of the Holy Spirit in the hearts
of our Christian brothers and sisters can contribute to our own edification.
Whatever is truly Christian never conflicts with the genuine interests
of the faith; indeed it can always result in a more ample realization of
the very mystery of Christ and the Church." Let us remember that the
Lord has not given his missionaries and evangelists a dispensation from
the commandment to love one another. Hence the legitimate proclamation
of the Gospel should bear the marks of Christian love as we find them enumerated
by St. Paul in 1 Corinthians 13.
I believe that Evangelicals and Catholics have a particular responsibility
in this connection. Very often in the past these two communities—and they
are today the two largest Christian communities in the world—looked upon
each other with such suspicion, distrust, and even hostility that the very
Christian authenticity of the other was questioned. At times one has been
presented by the other in ways that completely distorted its identity.
These misunderstandings and conflicts have left a painful heritage.
It is for this reason that, as President of the Pontifical Council for
Promoting Christian Unity, I have been encouraged by recent attempts to
bring Evangelicals and Catholics into dialogue. I know that this has not
been, and is not even now, an easy task, nor is it seen sympathetically
by all in either community. Yet Catholics and Evangelicals live side-by-side
today in all of America and they will continue to do so in the coming century.
Are they to do so in peace or in conflict? Are they to evangelize "one
against the other" or "with one another"? How can we help
to make the second of these choices the reality? For whether we wish it
or not, a choice has to be made.
There is no doubt that Evangelicals and Catholics have begun to find
themselves on the same side in many of the great public debates of the
present day in the United States and elsewhere. In such places, all churches
are under attack, for God Himself is under attack. The Christian civilization
upon which both the north and the south of this hemisphere have been built
is itself under attack. The July 4, 1997 statement by Catholic, Evangelical,
and Orthodox leaders, "We Hold These Truths," shows just how
deep is the crisis in the United States—but similar situations are common
elsewhere. This is a cultural war in which Catholics and Evangelicals find
themselves with a common cause, the cause of Christ against a new paganism.
This does not mean, of course, that Evangelicals and Catholics have
overcome all their doctrinal differences or that their understanding of
the Gospel and of the Christian message has suddenly become identical.
For Catholics, it is a part of our faith that "it is through Christ’s
Catholic Church alone . . . that the fullness of the means of salvation
can be obtained" (Unitatis Redintegratio). New doctrinal understandings
have been forthcoming and differences have been clarified, but no one claims
that we have reached the kind of unity we would like to achieve. For that
reason we will surely continue to evangelize according to our beliefs.
What we look forward to is rather a way of carrying out this mission with
respect one for the other, according to principles similar to those I have
suggested. It means above all that we not direct our mission against the
other, but seek to preach Christ and draw to him those who continue to
wander in the darkness of sin and disbelief.
As I have said, this is a very delicate matter and certainly not an
easy task. The fact that we are here to consider it is, however, most encouraging.
I look forward with you all to these days together in the hope that we
may be able to contribute something towards bringing about a new spirit
of cooperation between Catholics and Evangelicals in Latin America, for
the good of the societies there and effectively to further the task of
the new evangelization that challenges us as we move forward into the next
Christian millennium.
Email this to a friend
copyright
© 1995-2008
Leadership U. All rights reserved.
Updated: 13 July 2002
|