Religious Affections, Part 3
by Jonathan Edwards
Previous Section Next Section Table of Contents
[XII.] 1. I shall consider Christian practice and holy life, as a manifestation and sign of the sincerity of a professing Christian, to the eye of his neighbors and brethren.
And that this is the chief sign of grace in this respect, is very evident from
the word of God. Christ, who knew best how to give us rules to judge of others,
has repeated it and inculcated it, that we should know them by their fruits:
Matt. 7:16, "Ye shall know them by their fruits." And then, after arguing the
point, and giving clear reasons why it must needs be, that men's fruits must be
the chief evidence of what sort they are, in the following verses, he closes by
repeating the assertion, verse 20, "Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know
them." Again, chap. 12:33, "Either make the tree good, and his fruit good; or
else make the tree corrupt, and his fruit corrupt." As much as to say, it is a
very absurd thing, for any to suppose that the tree is good and yet the fruit
bad, that the tree is of one sort, and the fruit of another; for the proper
evidence of the nature of the tree is its fruit. Nothing else can be intended
by that last clause in the verse, "For the tree is known by its fruit," than
that the tree is chiefly known by its fruit, that this is the main and most
proper diagnostic by which one tree is distinguished from another. So Luke
6:44, "Every tree is known by his own fruit." Christ nowhere says, Ye shall
know the tree by its leaves or flowers, or ye shall know men by their talk, or
ye shall know them by the good story they tell of their experiences, or ye
shall know them by the manner and air of their speaking, and emphasis and
pathos of expression, or by their speaking feelingly, or by making a very great
show by abundance of talk, or by many tears and affectionate expressions, or by
the affections ye feel in your hearts towards them; but by their fruits shall
ye know them; the tree is known by its fruit; every tree is known by its own
fruit. And as this is the evidence that Christ has directed us mainly to look
at in others, in judging of them, so it is the evidence that Christ has mainly
directed us to give to others, whereby they may judge of us: Matt. 5:16, "Let
your light so shine before men, that others seeing your good works, may glorify
your Father which is in heaven." Here Christ directs us to manifest our
godliness to others. Godliness is as it were a light that shines in the soul.
Christ directs that this light not only shine within, but that it should shine
out before men, that they may see it. But which way shall this be? It is by our
good works. Christ doth not say, that others hearing your good works, your good
story, or your pathetical expressions; but "that others, seeing your good
works, may glorify your Father which is in heaven." Doubtless, when Christ
gives us a rule how to make our light shine, that others may have evidence of
it, his rule is the best that is to be found. And the apostles do mention
Christian practice as the principal ground of their esteem of persons as true
Christians. As the Apostle Paul, in the 6th chapter of Hebrews. There the
apostle, in the beginning of the chapter, speaks of them that have great common
illuminations, that have "been enlightened, and have tasted of the heavenly
gift, and were made partakers of the Holy Ghost, and have tasted the good word
of God, and the powers of the world to come, that afterwards fall away, and are
like barren ground, that is nigh unto cursing, whose end is to be burned;" and
then immediately adds in the 9th verse (expressing his charity for the
Christian Hebrews, as having that saving grace, which is better then all these
common illuminations), "but beloved, we are persuaded better things of you, and
things that accompany salvation, though we thus speak." And then, in the next
verse, he tells them what was the reason he had such good thoughts of them: he
does not say, that it was because they had given him a good account of a work
of God upon their souls, and talked very experimentally; but it was their work
and labor of love; "for God is not unrighteous, to forget your work and labor
of love, which ye have showed towards his name, in that ye have ministered to
the saints, and do minister." And the same apostle speaks of a faithful serving
of God in practice, as the proper proof to others of men's loving Christ above
all, and preferring his honor to their private interest: Phil. 2:21: 22, "For
all seek their own, not the things which are Jesus Christ's; but ye know the
proof of him, that as a son with the father, he hath served with me in the
gospel." So the Apostle John expresses the same, as the ground of his good
opinion of Gaius, 3 John 3-6, "For I rejoiced greatly when the brethren came
and testified of the truth that is in thee." But how did the brethren testify
of the truth that was in Gaius? And how did the apostle judge of the truth that
was in him? It was not because they testified that he had given them a good
account of the steps of his experiences, and talked lake one that felt what he
said, and had the very language of a Christian, but they testified that he
walked in the truth; as it follows, "even as thou walkest in the truth. I have
no greater joy than to hear that my children walk in the truth. Beloved, thou
doest faithfully whatsoever thou doest to the brethren and to strangers; which
have borne witness of thy charity before the church." Thus the apostle explains
what the brethren had borne witness of when they came and testified of his
walking in the truth. And the apostle seems in this same place, to give it as a
rule to Gaius how he should judge of others; in verse 10, he mentions one
Diotrephes, that did not carry himself well, and led away others after him; and
then in the 11th verse, he directs Gaius to beware of such, and not to follow
them; and gives him a rule whereby he may know them, exactly agreeable to that
rule Christ had given before, "by their fruits ye shall know them;" says the
apostle, "beloved, follow not that which is evil, but that which is good. He
that doeth good, is of God; but he that doeth evil hath not seen God." And I
would further observe, that the Apostle James, expressly comparing that way of
showing others our faith and Christianity by our practice or works, with other
ways of showing our faith without works, or not by works, does plainly and
abundantly prefer the former: James 2:18, "Yea, a man may say, Thou hast faith,
and I have works; show me thy faith without thy works, and I will show thee my
faith by my works." A manifestation of our faith without works, or in a way
diverse from works, is a manifestation of it in words, whereby a man professes
faith. As the apostle says, verse 14, "What doth it profit, my brethren, though
a man say he hath faith?" Therefore here are two ways of manifesting to our
neighbor what is in our hearts; one by what we say, and the other by what we
do. But the apostle abundantly prefers the latter as the best evidence. Now
certainly all accounts we give of ourselves in words, our saying that we have
faith, and that we are converted, and telling the manner how we came to have
faith, and the steps by which it was wrought, and the discoveries and
experiences that accompany it, are still but manifesting our faith by what we
say; it is but showing our faith by our words; which the apostle speaks of as
falling vastly short of manifesting of it by what we do, and showing our faith
by our works.
And as the Scripture plainly teaches, that practice is the best evidence of the
sincerity of professing Christians; so reason teaches the same thing. Reason
shows, that men's deeds are better and more faithful interpreters of their
minds, than their words. The common sense of all mankind, through all ages and
nations, teaches them to judge of men's hearts chiefly by their practice, in
other matters; as, whether a man be a loyal subject, a true lover, a dutiful
child, or a faithful servant. If a man profess a great deal of love and
friendship to another, reason teaches all men, that such a profession is not so
great an evidence of his being a real and hearty friend, as his appearing a
friend in deeds; being faithful and constant to his friend in prosperity and
adversity, ready to lay out himself, and deny himself, and suffer in his
personal interest, to do him a kindness. A wise man will trust to such
evidences of the sincerity of friendship, further than a thousand earnest
professions and solemn declarations, and most affectionate expressions of
friendship in words. And there is equal reason why practice should also be
looked upon as the best evidence of friendship towards Christ. Reason says the
same that Christ said, in John 14:21, "He that hath my commandments and keepeth
them, he it is that loveth me." Thus if we see a man, who in the course of his
life seems to follow and imitate Christ and greatly to exert and deny himself
for the honor of Christ, and to promote his kingdom and interest in the world;
reason teaches, that this is an evidence of love to Christ, more to be depended
on, than if a man only says he has love to Christ, and tells of the inward
experiences he has had of love to him, what strong love he felt, and how his
heart was drawn out in love at such and such a time, when it may be there
appears but little imitation of Christ in his behavior and he seems backward to
do any great matter for him, or to put himself out of his way for the promoting
of his kingdom, but seems to be apt to excuse himself whenever he is called to
deny himself for Christ. So if a man, in declaring his experiences, tells how
he found his heart weaned from the world, and saw the vanity of it, so that all
looked as nothing to him, at such and such times, and professes that he gives
up all to God, and calls heaven and earth to witness to it; but yet in has
practice is violent in pursuing the world, and what he gets he keeps close, is
exceeding loth to part with much of it to charitable and pious uses, it comes
from him almost like his heart's blood. But there is another professing
Christian, that says not a great deal, yet in his behavior appears ready at all
times to forsake the world, whenever it stands in the way of his duty, and is
free to part with it at any time to promote religion and the good of his fellow
creatures. Reason teaches, that the latter gives far the most credible
manifestation of a heart weaned from the world. And if a man appears to walk
humbly before God and men, and to be of a conversation that savors of a broken
heart, appearing patient and resigned to God under affliction, and meek in his
behavior amongst men; this is a better evidence of humiliation, than if a
person only tells how great a sense he had of his own unworthiness, how he was
brought to lie in the dust, and was quite emptied of himself, and saw himself
nothing and all overfilthy and abominable &c. &c., but yet acts as if
he looked upon himself one of the first and best of saints, and by just right
the head of all the Christians in the town, and is assuming, self-willed, and
impatient of the least contradiction or opposition; we may be assured in such a
case, that a man's practice comes from a lower place in his heart than his
profession. So (to mention no more instances) if a professor of Christianity
manifests in his behavior a pitiful tender spirit towards others in calamity,
ready to bear their burdens with them, willing to spend his substance for them,
and to suffer many inconveniences in his worldly interest to promote the good
of others' souls and bodies; is not this a more credible manifestation of a
spirit of love to men, than only a man's telling what love he felt to others at
certain times, how he pitied their souls, how his soul was in travail for them,
and how he felt hearty love and pity to his enemies; when in his behavior he
seems to be of a very selfish spirit, close and niggardly, all for himself, and
none for his neighbors and perhaps envious and contentious? Persons in a pang
of affection may think they have a willingness of heart for great things, to do
much and to suffer much, and so may profess it very earnestly and confidently,
when really their hearts are far from it. Thus many in their affectionate
pangs, have thought themselves willing to be damned eternally for the glory of
God. Passing affections easily produce words; and words are cheap; and
godliness is more easily feigned in words than in actions. Christian practice
is a costly, laborious thing. The self-denial that is required of Christians,
and the narrowness of the way that leads to life, does not consist in words,
but in practice. Hypocrites may much more easily be brought to talk like
saints, than to act like saints.
Thus it is plain, that Christian practice is the best sign or manifestation of
the true godliness of a professing Christian, to the eye of his neighbors.
But then the following things should be well observed, that this matter may be
rightly understood.
First, it must be observed, that when the Scripture speaks of Christian
practice, as the best evidence to others, of sincerity and truth of grace, a
profession of Christianity is not excluded, but supposed. The rules mentioned,
were rules given to the followers of Christ, to guide them in their thoughts of
professing Christians, and those that offered themselves as some of their
society, whereby they might judge of the truth of their pretenses, and the
sincerity of the profession they made; and not for the trial of Heathens, or
those that made no pretense to Christianity, and that Christians had nothing to
do with. This is as plain as is possible in that great rule which Christ gives
in the 7th of Matthew, "By their fruits ye shall know them." He there gives a
rule how to judge of those that professed to be Christians, yea, that made a
very high profession, false prophets, "who came in sheep's clothing," as ver.
15. So it is also with that of the Apostle James, chap 2:18, "Show me thy faith
without thy works, and I will show thee my faith by my works." It is evident,
that both these sorts of persons, offering to give these diverse evidences of
their faith, are professors of faith: this is implied in their offering each of
them to give evidences of the faith they professed. And it is evident by the
preceding verses, that the apostle is speaking of professors of faith in Jesus
Christ. So it is very plain, that the Apostle John, in those passages that have
been observed in his third epistle, is speaking of professing Christians.
Though in these rules, the Christian practice of professors be spoken of as the
greatest and most distinguishing sign of their sincerity in their profession,
much more evidential than their profession itself; yet a profession of
Christianity is plainly presupposed: it is not the main thing in the evidence,
nor anything distinguishing in it; yet it is a thing requisite and necessary in
it. As the having an animal body, is not anything distinguishing of a man, from
other creatures, and is not the main thing in the evidence of human nature, yet
it is a thing requisite and necessary in the evidence. So that if any man
should say plainly that he was not a Christian, and did not believe that Jesus
was the Son of God, or a person sent of God; these rules of Christ and his
apostles do not at all oblige us to look upon him as a sincere Christian, let
his visible practice and virtues be what they will. And not only do these rules
take no place with respect to a man that explicitly denies Christianity, and is
a professed Deist, Jew, Heathen, or open Infidel; but also with respect to a
man that only forbears to make a profession of Christianity; because these
rules were given us to judge of professing Christians only: fruits must be
joined with open flowers; bells and pomegranates go together.
But here will naturally arise this inquiry, viz., when may a man be said to
profess Christianity, or what profession may properly be called a profession of
Christianity?
I answer, in two things.
1. In order to a man's being properly said to make a profession of
Christianity, there must undoubtedly be a profession of all that is necessary
to his being a Christian, or of so much as belongs to the essence of
Christianity. Whatsoever is essential in Christianity itself, the profession of
that is essential in the profession of Christianity. The profession must be of
the thing professed. For a man to profess Christianity, is for him to declare
that he has it. And therefore so much as belongs to a thing, so as to be
necessary in order to its being truly denominated that thing; so much is
essential to the declaration of that thing, in order to its being truly
denominated a declaration of that thing if we take only a part of Christianity,
and leave out a part that is essential to it, what we take is not Christianity;
because something that is of the essence of it is wanting. So if we profess
only a part, and leave out a part that is essential, that which we profess is
not Christianity. Thus, in order to a profession of Christianity, we must
profess that we believe that Jesus is the Messiah for this reason, because such
a belief is essential to Christianity. And so we must profess, either expressly
or implicitly, that Jesus satisfied for our sins, and other essential doctrines
of the gospel, because a belief of these things also is essential to
Christianity. But there are other things as essential to religion, as an
orthodox belief; which it is therefore as necessary that we should profess, in
order to our being truly said to profess Christianity. Thus it is essential to
Christianity that we repent of our sins, that we be convinced of our own
sinfulness, and that we are sensible we have justly exposed ourselves to God's
wrath, and that our hearts do renounce all sin, and that we do with our whole
hearts embrace Christ as our only Savior; and that we love him above all, and
are willing for his sake to forsake all, and that we do give up ourselves to be
entirely and forever his, &c. Such things as these do as much belong to the
essence of Christianity, as the belief of any of the doctrines of the gospel:
and therefore the profession of them does as much belong to a Christian
profession. Not that in order to a being professing Christians, it is necessary
that there should be an explicit profession of every individual thing that
belongs to Christian grace or virtue: but certainly, there must be a
profession, either express or implicit, of what is of the essence of religion.
And as to those things that Christians should express in their profession, we
ought to be guided by the precepts of God's word or by Scripture examples of
public professions of religion, God's people have made from time to time. Thus
they ought to profess their repentance of sin: as of old, when persons were
initiated as professors, they came confessing their sins, manifesting their
humiliation for sin, Matt. 3:6. And the baptism they were baptized with, was
called the baptism of repentance, Mark 1:4. And John, when he had baptized
them, exhorted them to bring forth fruits meet for repentance, Matt. 3:8, i.e.,
agreeable to that repentance which they had professed; encouraging them that if
they did so, they should escape the wrath to come, and be gathered as wheat
into God's garner, Matt. 3:7, 8, 9, 10, 12. So the Apostle Peter says to the
Jews, Acts 2:38, "Repent, and be baptized;" which shows, that repentance is a
qualification that must be visible in order to baptism; and therefore ought to
be publicly professed. So when the Jews that returned from captivity, entered
publicly into covenant, it was with confession or public confession of
repentance of their sins, Neh. 9:2. This profession of repentance should
include or imply a profession of conviction, that God would be just in our
damnation: see Neh. 9:33, together with ver. 35, and the beginning of the next
chapter. They should profess their faith in Jesus Christ, and that they embrace
Christ, and rely upon him as their Savior, with their whole hearts, and that
they do joyfully entertain the gospel of Christ. Thus Philip, in order to
baptizing the eunuch, required that he should profess that he believed with all
his heart: and they that were received as visible Christians, at that great
outpouring of the Spirit, which began at the day of Pentecost, appeared gladly
to receive the gospel: Acts 2:41, "Then they that gladly received the word,
were baptized; and the same day there were added unto them about three thousand
souls." They should profess that they rely on Christ's righteousness only, and
strength; and that they are devoted to him, as their only Lord and Savior, and
that they rejoice in him as their only righteousness and portion. It is
foretold, that all nations shall be brought publicly to make this profession,
Isa. 45:29, to the end: "Look unto me, and be ye saved, all the ends of the
earth; for I am God, and there is none else. I have sworn by myself, the word
is gone out of my mouth in righteousness, and shall not return, that unto me
every knee shall bow, every tongue shall swear. Surely, shall one say, In the
Lord have I righteousness and strength; even to him shall men come, and all
that are incensed against him shall be ashamed. In the Lord shall all the seed
of Israel be justified, and shall glory." They should profess to give up
themselves entirely to Christ, and to God through him; as the children of
Israel, when they publicly recognized their covenant with God: Deut. 26:17,
"Thou hast avouched the Lord this day to be thy God, and to walk in his ways,
and to keep his statutes, and his commandments, and his judgments, and to
hearken unto his voice." They ought to profess a willingness of heart to
embrace religion with all its difficulties, and to walk in a way of obedience
to God universally and perseveringly, Exod. 19:8, and 24:3, 7, Deut. 26:16, 17,
18, 2 Kings 23:3, Neh. 10:28, 29, Psal. 119:57, 106. They ought to profess,
that all their hearts and souls are in these engagements to be the Lord's and
forever to serve him, 2 Chron. 15:12, 13, 14. God's people swearing to God, and
swearing by his name, or to his name, as it might be rendered (by which seems
to be signified their solemnly giving up themselves to him in covenant, and
vowing to receive him as their God, and to be entirely his, to obey and serve
him), is spoken of as a duty to be performed by all God's visible Israel, Deut.
6:13, and 10:20, Psal. 63:11, Isa. 19:18, chap. 14:23, 24, compared with Rom.
14:11, and Phil. 2:10, 11, Isa. 48:1, 2, and 65:15, 16, Jer. 4:2, and 5:7, and
12:16, Hos. 4:16, and 10:4. Therefore, in order to persons being entitled to
full esteem and charity, with their neighbors, as being sincere professors of
Christianity; by those forementioned rules of Christ and his apostles, there
must be a visibly holy life, with a profession, either expressing, or plainly
implying such things as those which have been now mentioned. We are to know
them by their fruits, that is, we are by their fruits to know whether they be
what they profess to be; not that we are to know by their fruits, that they
have something in them, they do not so much as pretend to.
And moreover,
2. That profession of these things, which is properly called a Christian
profession, and which must be joined with Christian practice, in order to
persons being entitled to the benefit of those rules, must be made (as to what
appears) understandingly: that is, they must be persons that appear to have
been so far instructed in the principles of religion, as to be in an ordinary
capacity to understand the proper import of what is expressed in their
profession. For sounds are no significations or declarations of any thing, any
further than men understand the meaning of their own sounds.
But in order to persons making a proper profession of Christianity, such as the
Scripture directs to and such as the followers of Christ should require, in
order to the acceptance of the professors with full charity, as of their
society; it is not necessary they should give an account of the particular
steps and method by which the Holy Spirit, sensibly to them, wrought and
brought about those great essential things of Christianity in their hearts.
There is no footstep in the Scripture of any such way of the apostles, or
primitive ministers and Christians requiring any such relation, in order to
their receiving and treating others as their Christian brethren, to all intents
and purposes, or of their first examining them, concerning the particular
method and order of their experiences. They required of them a profession of
the things wrought; but no account of the manner of working was required of
them. Nor is there the least shadow in the Scripture of any such custom in the
church of God from Adam to the death of the Apostle John.
I am far from saying, that it is not requisite that persons should give any
sort of account of their experiences to their brethren. For persons to profess
those things wherein the essence of Christianity lies, is the same thing as to
profess that they experience those things. Thus for persons solemnly to
profess, that, in a full conviction of their own utter sinfulness, misery, and
impotence, and totally undone state as in themselves, and their just desert of
God's utter rejection and eternal wrath, and the utter insufficiency of their
own righteousness, or anything in them, to satisfy divine justice, or recommend
them to God's favor; they do entirely depend on the Lord Jesus Christ, and his
satisfaction and righteousness; that they do with all their hearts believe the
truth of the gospel of Christ: and that in a full conviction of his sufficiency
and perfect excellency as a Savior, as exhibited in the gospel, they do with
their whole souls cleave to him, and acquiesce in him, as the refuge and rest
of their souls, and fountain of their comfort; that they repent of their sins,
and utterly renounce all sin, and give up themselves wholly to Christ,
willingly subjecting themselves to him as their King; that they give him their
hearts and their whole man; and are willing and resolved to have God for their
whole and everlasting portion; and in a dependence on his promises of a future
eternal enjoyment of him in heaven, to renounce all the enjoyments of this vain
world, selling all for this great treasure and future inheritance, and to
comply with every command of God, even the most difficult and self-denying, and
devote their whole lives to God's service; and that in forgiveness of those
that have injured them, and a general benevolence to mankind, their hearts are
united to the people of Jesus Christ as their people, to cleave to them and
love them as their brethren, and worship and serve God, and follow Christ in
union and fellowship with them, being willing and resolved to perform all those
duties that belong to them, as members of the same family of God and mystical
body of Christ: I say, for persons solemnly to profess such things as these, as
in the presence of God, is the same thing as to profess that they are conscious
to, or do experience such things in their hearts.
Nor is it what I suppose, that persons giving an account of their experience of
particular exercises of grace, with the times and circumstances, gives no
advantage to others in forming a judgment of their state; or that persons may
not fitly be inquired of concerning these in some cases, especially cases of
great importance, where all possible satisfaction concerning persons' piety is
especially to be desired and sought after, as in the case of ordination or
approbation of a minister. It may give advantage in forming a judgment, in
several respects; and among others, in this, that hereby we may be better
satisfied, that the professor speaks honestly and understandingly, in what he
professes; and that he does not make the profession in mere formality.
In order to a profession of Christianity being accepted to any purpose, there
ought to be good reason, from the circumstances of the profession, to think,
that the professor does not make such a profession out of a mere customary
compliance with a prescribed form, using words without any distinct meaning, or
in a very lax and ambiguous manner, as confessions of faith are often
subscribed; but that the professor understandingly and honestly signifies what
he is conscious of in his own heart; otherwise his profession can be of no
significance, and no more to be regarded than the sound of things without life.
But indeed (whatever advantage an account of particular exercises may give in
judging of this) it must be owned, that the professor having been previously
thoroughly instructed by his teachers, and given good proof of his sufficient
knowledge, together with a practice agreeable to his profession, is the best
evidence of this.
Nor do I suppose, but that, if a person that is inquired of about particular
passages, times, and circumstances of his Christian experiences among other
things, seems to be able to give a distinct account of the manner of his first
conversion, in such a method as has been frequently observable in true
conversion, so that things seem sensibly and distinctly to follow one another,
in the order of time, according to the order of nature; it is an illustrating
circumstance, that among other things adds luster to the evidence he gives his
brethren of the truth of his experiences.
But the thing that I speak of as unscriptural, is the insisting on a particular
account of the distinct method and steps, wherein the Spirit of God did
sensibly proceed, in first bringing the soul into a state of salvation, as a
thing requisite in order to receiving a professor into full charity as a real
Christian; or so, as for the want of such relation, to disregard other things
in the evidence persons give to their neighbors of their Christianity, that are
vastly more important and essential.
Secondly, That we may rightly understand how Christian practice is the greatest
evidence that others can have of the sincerity of a professing Christian, it is
needful that what was said before, showing what Christian practice is, should
be borne in mind; and that it should be considered how far this may be visible
to others. Merely that a professor of Christianity is what is commonly called
an honest man, and a moral man (i.e., we have no special transgression or
iniquity to charge him with, that might bring a blot on his character), is no
great evidence of the sincerity of his profession. This is not making his light
shine before men. This is not that work and labor of love showed towards
Christ's name, which gave the apostle such persuasion of the sincerity of the
professing Hebrews, Heb. 6:9, 10. It may be so, that we may see nothing in a
man, but that he may be a good man; there may appear nothing in his life and
conversation inconsistent with his being godly, and yet neither may there be
any great positive evidence that he is so. But there may be great positive
appearance of holiness in men's visible behavior. Their life may appear to be a
life of the service of God: they may appear to follow the example of Jesus
Christ, and come up in a great measure to those excellent rules in the 5th,
6th, and 7th chapters of Matthew, and 12th of Romans, and many other parts of
the New Testament: there may be a great appearance of their being universal in
their obedience to Christ's commands and the rules of the gospel. They may
appear to be universal in the performance of the duties of the first table,
manifesting the fear and love of God; and also universal in fulfilling rules of
love to men, love to saints, and love to enemies: rules of meekness and
forgiveness rules of mercy and charity, and looking not only at our own things
but also at the things of others; rules of doing good to men's souls and
bodies, to particular persons and to the public; rules of temperance and
mortification, and of a humble conversation; rules of bridling the tongue, and
improving it to glorify God and bless men, showing that in their tongues is the
law of kindness. They may appear to walk as Christians, in all places, and at
all seasons, in the house of God, and in their families, and among their
neighbors, on Sabbath days and every day, in business and in conversation,
towards friends and enemies, towards superiors, inferiors, and equals. Persons
in their visible walk may appear to be very earnestly engaged in the service of
God and mankind, much to labor and lay out themselves in this work of a
Christian, and to be very constant and steadfast in it, under all circumstances
and temptations. There may be great manifestations of a spirit to deny
themselves, and suffer for God and Christ, and the interest of religion, and
the benefit of their brethren. There may be great appearances in a man's walk,
of a disposition to forsake any thing, rather than to forsake Christ, and to
make everything give place to his honor. There may be great manifestations in a
man's behavior of such religion as this, being his element, and of his placing
the delight and happiness of his life in it; and his conversation may be such,
that he may carry with him a sweet odor of Christian graces and heavenly
dispositions, wherever he goes. And when it is thus in the professors of
Christianity, here is an evidence to others of their sincerity in their
profession, to which all other manifestations are not worthy to be compared.
There is doubtless a great variety in the degrees of evidence that professors
do exhibit of their sincerity, in their life and practice; as there is a
variety in the fairness and clearness of accounts persons give of the manner
and method of their experiences: but undoubtedly such a manifestation as has
been described of a Christian spirit in practice, is vastly beyond the fairest
and brightest story of particular steps and passages of experience that ever
was told. And in general, a manifestation of the sincerity of a Christian
profession in practice, is far better than a relation of experiences. But
yet,
Thirdly, It must be noted, agreeable to what was formerly observed, that no
external manifestations and outward appearances whatsoever, that are visible to
the world, are infallible evidences of grace. These manifestations that have
been mentioned, are the best that mankind can have; and they are such as do
oblige Christians entirely to embrace professors as saints, and love them and
rejoice in them as the children of God, and are sufficient to give them as
great satisfaction concerning them, as ever is needful to guide them in their
conduct, or for any purpose that needs to be answered in this world. But
nothing that appears to them in their neighbor, can be sufficient to beget an
absolute certainty concerning the state of his soul: for they see not his
heart, nor can they see all his external behavior; for much of it is in secret,
and hid from the eye of the world; and it is impossible certainly to determine
how far a man maw go in many external appearances and imitations of grace, from
other principles. Though undoubtedly, if others could see so much of what
belongs to men's practice, as their own consciences may see of it, it might be
an infallible evidence of their state, as will appear from what follows.
Having thus considered Christian practice as the best evidence of the sincerity
of professors to others, I now proceed,
2. To observe, that the Scripture also speaks of Christian practice as a
distinguishing and sure evidence of grace to persons' own consciences.
This is very plain in 1 John 2:3: "Hereby we do know that we know him, if we
keep his commandments." And the testimony of our consciences, with respect to
our good deeds, is spoken of as that which may give us assurance of our own
godliness, 1 John 3:18, 19: "My little children, let us not love in word,
neither in tongue, but in deed and in truth. And hereby we know that we are of
the truth, and shall assure our hearts before him." And the Apostle Paul, in
Heb. 6, speaks of the work and labor of love, of the Christian Hebrews, as that
which both gave him a persuasion that they had something above the highest
common illuminations, and also as that evidence which tended to give them the
highest assurance of hope concerning themselves, verse 9, &c.: "But,
beloved, we are persuaded better things of you, and things that accompany
salvation, though we thus speak. For God is not unrighteous, to forget your
work and labor of love, which ye have showed toward his name, in that ye have
ministered to his saints, and do minister. And we desire that everyone of you
do show the same diligence, to the full assurance of hope unto the end." So the
apostle directs the Galatians to examine their behavior or practice, that they
might have rejoicing in themselves in their own happy state, Gal. 6:4: "Let
every man prove his own work, so shall he have rejoicing in himself, and not in
another." And the psalmist says, Psal. 119:6, "Then shall I not be ashamed,
when I have respect unto all thy commandments;" i.e., then I shall be bold, and
assured, and steadfast in my hope. And in that of our Savior, Matt. 7:19, 20:
"Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit, is hewn down and cast into the
fire. Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them." Though Christ gives this,
firstly, as a rule by which we should judge of others, yet in the words that
next follow he plainly shows, that he intends it also as a rule by which we
would judge ourselves: "Not everyone that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall
Enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which
is in heaven. Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, &c.--And then
will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work
iniquity. Therefore, whosoever heareth these sayings of mine, and doeth them, I
will liken him unto a wise man, which built his house upon a rock.--And
everyone that heareth these sayings of mine, and doeth them not, shall be
likened unto a foolish man, which built his house upon the sand." I shall have
occasion to mention other texts to show the same thing, hereafter.
But for the greater clearness in this matter, I would, first, show how
Christian practice, doing good works, or keeping Christ's commandments, is to
be taken, when the Scripture represents it as a sure sign to our own
consciences, that we are real Christians. And secondly, will prove, that this
is the chief of all evidences that men can have of their own sincere
godliness.
First, I would show how Christian practice, or keeping Christ's commandments,
is to be taken, when the Scripture represents it as a sure evidence to our own
consciences, that we are sincere Christians.
And here I would observe, that we cannot reasonably suppose, that when the
Scripture in this case speaks of good works, good fruit, and keeping Christ's
commandments, it has respect merely to what is external, or the motion and
action of the body without including anything else, having no respect to any
aim or intention of the agent, or any act of his understanding or will. For
consider men's actions so, and they are no more good works or acts of
obedience, than the regular motions of a clock; nor are they considered as the
actions of the man, nor any human actions at all. The actions of the body,
taken thus, are neither acts of obedience nor disobedience, any more than the
motions of the body in a convulsion. But the obedience and fruit that is spoken
of, is the obedience and fruit of the man; and therefore not only the acts of
the body, but the obedience of the soul, consisting in the acts and practice of
the soul. Not that I suppose, that when the Scripture speaks, in this case, of
gracious works, and fruit and practice, that in these expressions are included
all inward piety and holiness of heart, both principle and exercise, both
spirit and practice: because then, in these things being given as signs of a
gracious principle in the heart, the same thing would be given as a sign of
itself, and there would be no distinction between root and fruit. But only the
gracious exercise, and holy act of the soul is meant, and given as the sign of
the holy principle and good estate. Neither is every kind of inward exercise of
grace meant; but the practical exercise, that exercise of the soul, and
exertion of inward holiness, which there is in an obediential act; or that
exertion of the mind, and act of grace which issues and terminates in what they
call the imperate acts of the will; in which something is directed and
commanded by the soul to be done, and brought to pass in practice.
Here, for a clearer understanding, I would observe, that there are two kinds of
exercises of grace. 1. There are those that some call immanent acts, that is,
those exercises of grace that remain within the soul, that begin and are
terminated there, without any immediate relation to anything to be done
outwardly, or to be brought to pass in practice. Such are the exercises of
grace, which the saints often have in contemplation; when the exercise that is
in the heart does not directly proceed to, or terminate in anything beyond the
thoughts of the mind; however they may tend to practice (as all exercises of
grace do) more remotely. 2. There is another kind of acts of grace, that are
more strictly called practical, or effective exercises, because they
immediately respect something to be done. They are the exertions of grace in
the commanding acts of the will, directing the outward actions. As when a saint
gives a cup of cold water to a disciple, in and from the exercise of the grace
of charity; or voluntarily endures persecution in the way of his duty;
immediately from the exercise of a supreme love to Christ. Here is the exertion
of grace producing its effect in outward actions. These exercises of grace are
practical and productive of good works, not only in this sense, that they are
of a productive nature (for so are all exercises of true grace), but they are
the producing acts. This is properly the exercise of grace in the act of the
will; and this is properly the practice of the soul. And the soul is the
immediate actor of no other practice but this; the motions of the body follow
from the laws of union between the soul and body, which God, and not the soul,
has fixed and does maintain. The act of the soul and the exercise of grace,
that is exerted in the performance of a good work, is the good work itself, so
far as the soul is concerned in it, or so far as it is the soul's good work.
The determinations of the will are indeed our very actions, so far as they are
properly ours, as Dr. Doddridge observes.[78] In this practice of the soul is
included the aim and intention of the soul, which is the agent. For not only
should we not look on the motions of a statue, doing justice or distributing
alms by clockwork, as any acts of obedience to Christ in that statue; but
neither would anybody call the voluntary actions of a man, externally and
materially agreeable to a command of Christ, by the name of obedience to
Christ, if he had never heard of Christ, or any of his commands, or had no
thought of his commands in what he did. If the acts of obedience and good fruit
spoken of, be looked upon, not as mere motions of the body, but as acts of the
soul; the whole exercise of the spirit of the mind in the action must be taken
in, with the end acted for, and the respect the soul then has to God, &c.,
otherwise they are no acts of denial of ourselves, or obedience to God, or
service done to him, but something else. Such effective exercises of grace as
these that I have now described, many of the Martyrs have experienced in a high
degree. And all true saints live a life of such acts of grace as these; as they
all live a life of gracious works, of which these operative exertions of grace
are the life and soul. And this is the obedience and fruit that God mainly
looks at, as he looks at the soul more than the body; as much as the soul, in
the constitution of the human nature, is the superior part. As God looks at the
obedience and practice of the man, he looks at the practice of the soul; for
the soul is the man in God's sight, "for the Lord seeth not as man seeth, for
he looketh on the heart."
And thus it is that obedience, good works, good fruits, are to be taken, when
given in Scripture as a sure evidence to our own consciences of a true
principle of grace: even as including the obedience and practice of the soul,
as preceding and governing the actions of the body. When practice is given in
Scripture as the main evidence to others of our true Christianity, then is
meant that in our practice which is visible to them, even our outward
actions: but when practice is given as a sure evidence of our real Christianity
to our own consciences, then is meant that in our practice which is
visible to our own consciences; which is not only the motion of our bodies, but
the exertion of the soul, which directs and commands that motion; which is more
directly and immediately under the view of our own consciences, than the act of
the body. And that this is the intent of the Scripture, not only does the
nature and reason of the thing show, but it is plain by the Scripture itself.
Thus it is evident that when Christ, at the conclusion of his sermon on the
mount, speaks of doing or practicing those sayings of his, as the grand sign of
professors being true disciples, without which he likens them to a man that
built his house upon the sand, and with which, to a man that built his house
upon a rock; he has a respect, not only to the outward behavior, but to the
inward exercise of the mind in that behavior: as is evident by observing what
those preceding sayings of his are that he refers to, when he speaks of our
doing or practicing them; and we shall find they are such as these: "Blessed
are the poor in spirit; blessed are they that mourn; blessed are the meek;
blessed are they that do hunger and thirst after righteousness; blessed are the
merciful; blessed are the pure in heart; whosoever is angry with his brother
without a cause, &c.; whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her,
&c.; love your enemies; take no thought for your life," and others of the
like nature, which imply inward exercises: and when Christ says, John 14:2, "He
that hath my commandments, and keepeth them, he it is that loveth me;" he has
evidently a special respect to that command several times repeated in the same
discourse (which he calls, by way of eminence, his commandment), that they
should love one another as he had loved them (see chap. 13:34, and chap. 15:10,
12, 13, 14). But this command respects chiefly an exercise of the mind or
heart, though exerted in practice. So when the Apostle John says, 1 John 2:3,
"Hereby we do know that we know him, if we keep his commandments;" he has
plainly a principal respect to the same command, as appears by what follows,
ver. 7-11, and 2d Epist. ver. 5, 6; and when we are told in Scripture that men
shall at the last day be judged according to their works, and all shall receive
according to the things done in the body, it is not to be understood only of
outward acts; for if so, why is God so often spoken of as searching the hearts
and trying the reins, "that he may render to everyone according to his works?"
As Rev. 2:23, "And all the churches shall know that I am he which searcheth the
reins and hearts; and I will give unto everyone according to his works." Jer.
17:9, 10, "I the Lord search the heart, I try the reins, even to give every man
according to his ways, and according to the fruit of his doings." But if by his
ways, and the fruit of his doings, is meant only the actions of his body, what
need of searching the heart and reins in order to know them? Hezekiah in his
sickness pleads his practice as an evidence of his title to God's favor, as
including not only his outward actions, but what was in his heart: Isa. 38:3,
"Remember now, O Lord, I beseech thee, how I have walked before thee in truth,
and with a perfect heart."
Though in this great evidence of sincerity that the Scripture gives us, what is
inward is of greatest importance; yet what is outward is included and intended,
as connected with the practical exertion of grace in the will, directing and
commanding the actions of the body. And hereby are effectually cut off all
pretensions that any man can have to evidences of godliness, who externally
lives wickedly; because the great evidence lies in that inward exercise and
practice of the soul, which consists in the acts of the will, commanding
outward acts. But it is known, that these commanding acts of the will are not
one way and the actions of the bodily organs another: for the unalterable law
of nature is, that they should be united as long as soul and body are united,
and the organs are not so destroyed as to be incapable of those motions that
the soul commands. Thus it would be ridiculous for a man to plead, that the
commanding act of his will was to go to the public worship, while his feet
carry him to a tavern or brothel-house; or that the commanding act of his will
was to give such a piece of money he had in his hand to a poor beggar, while
his hand at the same instant kept it back, and held it fast.
Previous Section Next Section Table of Contents
|