Religious Affections, Part 2
by Jonathan Edwards
Previous Section Next Section Table of Contents
II. It is no sign that affections have the nature of true
religion, or that they have not, that they have great effects on
the body.
All affections whatsoever, have in some respect or degree, an effect on the
body. As was observed before, such is our nature, and such are the laws of
union of soul and body, that the mind can have no lively or vigorous exercise,
without some effect upon the body. So subject is the body to the mind, and so
much do its fluids, especially the animal spirits, attend the motions and
exercises of the mind, that there cannot be so much as an intense thought,
without an effect upon them. Yea, it is questionable whether an imbodied soul
ever so much as thinks one thought, or has any exercise at all, but that there
is some corresponding motion or alteration of motion, in some degree, of the
fluids, in some part of the body. But universal experience shows, that the
exercise of the affections have in a special manner a tendency to some sensible
effect upon the body. And if this be so, that all affections have some effect
upon the body, we may then well suppose, the greater those affections be, and
the more vigorous their exercise (other circumstances being equal) the greater
will be the effect on the body. Hence it is not to be wondered at, that very
great and strong exercises of the affections should have great effects on the
body. And therefore, seeing there are very great affections, both common and
spiritual; hence it is not to be wondered at, that great effects on the body
should arise from both these kinds of affections. And consequently these
effects are no signs, that the affections they arise from, are of one kind or
the other.
Great effects on the body certainly are no sure evidences that affections are
spiritual; for we see that such effects oftentimes arise from great affections
about temporal things, and when religion is no way concerned in them. And if
great affections about secular things, that are purely natural, may have these
effects, I know not by what rule we should determine that high affections about
religious things, which arise in like manner from nature, cannot have the like
effect.
Nor, on the other hand, do I know of any rule any have to determine, that
gracious and holy affections, when raised as high as any natural affections,
and have equally strong and vigorous exercises, cannot have a great effect on
the body. No such rule can be drawn from reason: I know of no reason, why a
being affected with a view of God's glory should not cause the body to faint,
as well as being affected with a view of Solomon's glory. And no such rule has
as yet been produced from the Scripture; none has ever been found in all the
late controversies which have been about things of this nature. There is a
great power in spiritual affections: we read of the power which worketh in
Christians,[2] and of the Spirit of God
being in them as the Spirit of power,[3] and of the effectual working of his
power in them.[4] But man's nature is
weak: flesh and blood are represented in Scripture as exceeding weak; and
particularly with respect to its unfitness for great spiritual and heavenly
operations and exercises, Matt. 26:41, 1 Cor. 15:43, and 50. The text we are
upon speaks of "joy unspeakable, and full of glory." And who that considers
what man's nature is, and what the nature of the affections is, can reasonably
doubt but that such unutterable and glorious joys, may be too great and mighty
for weak dust and ashes, so as to be considerably overbearing to it? It is
evident by the Scripture that true divine discoveries, or ideas of God's glory,
when given in a great degree have a tendency, by affecting the mind, to
overbear the body; because the Scripture teaches us often, that if these ideas
or views should be given to such a degree as they are given in heaven, the weak
frame of the body could not subsist under it, and that no man can, in that
manner, see God and live. The knowledge which the saints have of God's beauty
and glory in this world, and those holy affections that arise from it, are of
the same nature and kind with what the saints are the subjects of in heaven,
differing only in degree and circumstances: what God gives them here, is a
foretaste of heavenly happiness, and an earnest of their future inheritance.
And who shall limit God in his giving this earnest, or say he shall give so
much of the inheritance, such a part of the future reward as an earnest of the
whole, and no more? And seeing God has taught us in his word, that the whole
reward is such, that it would at once destroy the body, is it not too bold a
thing for us, so to set bounds to the sovereign God, as to say that in giving
the earnest of this reward in this world, he shall never give so much of it, as
in the least to diminish the strength of the body, when God has nowhere thus
limited himself?
The Psalmist, speaking of the vehement religious affections he had, speaks of
an effect in his flesh or body, besides what was in his soul, expressly
distinguishing one from the other, once and again: Psal. 84:2, "My soul
longeth, yea, even fainteth for the courts of the Lord: my heart and my flesh
crieth out for the living God." Here is a plain distinction between the heart
and the flesh, as being each affected. So Psal. 63:1, "My soul thirsteth for
thee, my flesh longeth for thee, in a dry and thirsty land, where no water is."
Here also is an evident designed distinction between the soul and the flesh.
The prophet Habakkuk speaks of his bodies being overborne by a sense of the
majesty of God, Hab. 3:16: "When I heard, my belly trembled: my lips quivered
at the voice: rottenness enter into my bones, and I trembled in myself." So the
Psalmist speaks expressly of his flesh trembling, Psal. 119:120: My flesh
trembleth for fear of thee."
That such ideas of God's glory as are sometimes given in this world, have a
tendency to overhear the body, is evident, because the Scripture gives us an
account, that this has sometimes actually been the effect of those external
manifestations God has made of himself to some of the saints which were made to
that end, viz., to give them an idea of God's majesty and glory. Such instances
we have in the prophet Daniel, and the apostle John. Daniel, giving an account
of an external representation of the glory of Christ, says, Dan. 10:8, "And
there remained no strength in me; for my comeliness was turned into corruption,
and I retained no strength." And the apostle John, giving an account of the
manifestation made to him, says, Rev. 1:17, "And when I saw him, I fell at his
feet as dead." It is in vain to say here, these were only external
manifestations or symbols of the glory of Christ, which these saints beheld:
for though it be true, that they were outward representations of Christ's
glory, which they beheld with their bodily eyes; yet the end and use of these
external symbols are representations was to give to these prophets an idea of
the thing represented, and that was the true divine glory and majesty of
Christ, which is his spiritual glory; they were made use of only as
significations of this spiritual glory, and thus undoubtedly they received
them, and improved them, and were affected by them. According to the end for
which God intended these outward signs, they received by them a great and
lively apprehension of the real glory and majesty of God's nature, which they
were signs of; and thus were greatly affected, their souls swallowed up, and
their bodies overborne. And I think they are very bold and daring, who will say
God cannot, or shall not give the like clear and affecting ideas and
apprehensions of the same real glory and majesty of his nature, to any of his
saints, without the intervention of any such external shadows of it.
Before I leave this head, I would farther observe, that it is plain the
Scripture often makes use of bodily effects, to express the strength of holy
and spiritual affections; such as trembling,[5] groaning,[6] being sick,[7] crying out,[8] panting,[9] and fainting.[10] Now if it be supposed, that these are
only figurative expressions, to represent the degree of affection: yet I hope
all will allow, that they are fit and suitable figures to represent the high
degree of those spiritual affections, which the Spirit of God makes use of them
to represent; which I do not see how they would be, if those spiritual
affections, let them be in never to high a degree, have no tendency to any such
things; but that on the contrary, they are the proper effects and sad tokens of
false affections, and the delusion of the devil. I cannot think, God would
commonly make use of things which are very alien from spiritual affections, and
are shrewd marks of the hand of Satan, and smell strong of the bottomless pit,
as beautiful figures, to represent the high degree of holy and heavenly
affections.
Previous Section Next Section Table of Contents
|